Guyana<\/p>\n
Former Minister of Public Infrastructure David Patterson is rebutting the recent claims made by the Guyana Power and Light (GPL) that the company contracted to maintain its generators utilised cheap spares.<\/p>\n
He insists that purchases by Power Producers and Distribution Inc (PPDI) were original spare parts procured from companies with a reputable quality system.<\/p>\n
\u201cAll of the entities were listed on the Lloyd\u2019s of London\u2019s approved list of manufacturers,\u201d Patterson stated while arguing that there was never any objections to the proposals submitted by PPDI for works by GPL.<\/span><\/p>\n During the years of its management of the electricity generating sets, PPDI under its contractual obligations, was required to submit its annual operations and maintenance plan to be approved by GPL and its directors.<\/p>\n \u201cThis plan included among other information, the list of suppliers that PPDI was proposing to obtain spares from and there was never any objection to the parts suppliers by GPL,\u201d Patterson said on Friday\u00a0 as he responded to the utility company\u2019s statement issued on Thursday.<\/p>\n He assured that all of its procurement procedures were in compliance with the National Procurement and Tender Administration Board regulations and every procurement of a spare part was in compliance with the tendering process.<\/p>\n It was also pointed out that the GPL release failed to mention that the company had a representative on the board of PPDI, who at all times was a senior director of the power company.<\/p>\n \u201cAs an additional safeguard, GPL always had a representative on PPDI\u2019s tender board\u2026plus it had the extra assurance of being scrutinized by (the) GPL procurement department \u2013 to now claim the company departed from these established principles \u2013 is nothing more than new GPL\u2019s tangled web.\u201d<\/p>\n And in an additional layer to the oversight of PPDI, in keeping with the policy of inclusivity of the previous administration, a position on the board was reserved for a nominee of the then parliamentary opposition. This offer, Patterson said, they declined to accept from 2017 to 2020<\/p>\n According to the former minister, PPDI, which is a state-owned company, had its procurement manual developed by now Minister within the Ministry of Housing and Water, Susan Rodrigues, under the supervision of chartered accountant Christopher Ram and later approved by the Public Procurement Commission.<\/p>\n GPL on Thursday rejected Patterson\u2019s claim in a Kaieteur News report that PPDI had been up to standard and that the PPP\/C government had targeted its managers in August 2020 because their salaries were perceived to be too high.<\/p>\n According to GPL, \u201cearlier this year, PPDI had to cut invoices submitted for replacement parts used since 2018. It turned out that these are some of the off-market spares that failed prematurely that GPL was being asked to pay to replace.\u201d<\/p>\n When it was announced in October, 2018 that PPDI would be taking over the management of W\u00e4rtsil\u00e4 generators from the Finnish manufacturers, concerns were raised as to whether the level of service would be maintained.<\/p>\n According to GPL\u2019s statement, \u201cDuring the 20 + years that W\u00e4rtsil\u00e4 had the Operation and Maintenance Contract with GEC\/GPL, the various\u00a0power plants maintained an availability above 98%. Their maintenance programme was rigid and utilized only Original Equipment Manufacturer spares. Contrary to what former Minister Patterson asserts, the use of alternate spares came after PPDI was given the contract in 2016 and continued until 2021 when GPL discovered this breach of the Contract. The use of cheaper off the market spares allowed PPDI to realize healthy profits while GPL had to pay for the early replacement of the major components.\u201d<\/p>\n This claim was roundly denied by Patterson who pointed out that during the period 2017 \u2013 2020, there were no records of GPL raising any issues with the performance of PPDI. On the contrary, he said, GPL, was always in high praise of the service provided, \u201cso much so, that by the end of 2020, GPL and PPDI were in discussions on the expansion of maintenance services for other locations (Leguan, Wakenaam, Bartica, Anna Regina, etc.).\u201d<\/p>\n Major challenges In 2018, the company said it was difficult to get the Guyana Power and Light to make capital investments to plants with defects. It stated too that there were alternator failures at the newer Kingston 2 and Vreed-en-Hoop Power Plants.<\/p>\n For 2019, they said it was difficult to access the engines and release them in a timely manner to perform major overhauls at the recommended running time interval. This resulted in an increased wear and tear and thus increased the cost of the maintenance.<\/p>\n Also, during that year the company noted that they started experiencing payment delays from GPL Inc which hampered the timely procurement of spares thus driving up costs.<\/p>\n The former APNU+AFC government Minister stressed that PPDI was only formed after they recognised W\u00e4rtsil\u00e4\u2019s maintenance performance was not what the utility company was paying for.<\/p>\n
\n<\/strong>In a report submitted on Friday to the press by Patterson, PPDI said that they faced major challenges when it came to the maintenance of GPL generators. In their annual reports from 2018 to 2019, PPDI listed several of challenges they faced.<\/p>\n