TSTT denies whistleblower claims
A Guardian Media investigation has unearthed a damning whistleblower report inside the Telecommunications Services of Trinidad and Tobago (TSTT) which details specific questionable procurement practices and mega-million dollar deals without board approval.
While the State company is denying all the details contained in the report, its author, former executive vice president Mobile, Nicole Kerry Lumkin, is standing by her statements.
The Lumkin report, obtained by Guardian Media, details the special treatment granted to two companies owned by the same man.
News of the mismanaged finances comes even as TSTT, citing dire financial straits, let go over 500 employees last month to maintain its viability. The reports show that the company may have mismanaged more than half a billion dollars between 2013 and 2018.
Guardian Media made contact with TSTT’s Senior Manager, Corporate Communications, Marsha Caballero, last Thursday and was told that the company needed time to respond appropriately. The company sent its response to questions on the documents late yesterday. In that response, TSTT is denying any financial impropriety and accused this media house of “targeting” its chief executive officer, Dr Ronald Walcott.
In the first week of the year, Guardian Media received a packet of documents, including two internal audits, one by TSTT’s former internal audit manager Maitland Daniels, another by the company’s chief internal auditor Randy Marcano and an internal report by Lumkin.
The Lumkin report contains several questions, including why two cell phone retailers were granted special privileges with TSTT without board approval even though the deals were a financial strain on the company. In one of the documents, Lumkin questioned the relationship between TSTT, CellMaster and Mizova. According to the document, the two retailers were paid a flat fee of $9 million and $10.5 million respectively instead of a commission on sales like all other retailers.
Lumkin described the two contracts as “notoriously bad million-dollar contracts” which were allowed to continue in the absence of board approval and limited returns for TSTT.
Both retail outlets are owned and operated by Richard Smith, who is related to the former sport minister Darryl Smith.
Lumkin, in her report, detailed the financial viability of all TSTT retailers and found that while the average cost per transaction with other retailers ranged from $64 to $115, CellMaster carried a $546.68 fee per transaction and Mizova was paid a massive $9,971.51 per transaction. While other retailers got a commission ranging from three to 13 per cent, CellMaster earned a 21 per cent versus Mizova’s 16 per cent.
“TSTT simply makes a huge loss at the Mizova stores of more than $9,000 per transaction,” Lumkin noted in the report.
“To date, TSTT has spent approximately $50 million on these two contracts.”
She added that the only “responsible” thing to do was to terminate the two contracts. However, that was never done.
Under the banner “important facts,” Lumkin said that the original CellMaster contract was valued at approximately $27 million between 2011 and 2014. She claimed that the contract never received board approval.
“I have not been able to find the original business case or any other material that properly justifies this contract,” Lumkin said.
Lumkin said the “original Mizova contract was approved via the CEO financial authority limit and was valued at $3.5 million.” That contract expired since January 31, 2015.
“Again, this contract did not receive board approval, and I have not been able to find the original business case or any other material that properly justifies this contract,” Lumkin said in her report.
Aside from that preferential treatment, Lumkin also noted that before Ronald Walcott became TSTT’s chief executive officer, “he directly managed CellMaster from 2011 to 2013 as Head of the Prepaid and Channel Management Department.”
Lumkin proposed that both contracts be terminated and had the support of the executives. However, by January 2016 the contract documents for the two companies were back on the table. She said she wrote to the executives but never received a response. By January 25, 2016, she was informed that the two contracts would continue and would go forward for board approval.
… more
Image: Sarah Klockars-Clauser, Open Photo